Overcorrecting is something I do on a regular basis, so I get it. And I’ve always had students who do it, but not so many in the same exact way as now.

One common misconception that students seem to arrive with is that “=” means “and here’s the next step”. So you get bizarre false statements like

,

and the worst part of it is that students don’t realize that what they have written claims that .

And so we have conversations in my class about the meaning of symbols, and how it is acceptable to write = as a random connector symbol in your history notes, but in math class = is used to mean actual equality and nothing else. I stress the importance of clear communication, and give examples of basic mathematical communication standards — like how

might be fine as a note to yourself, but would be poor communication.

All this I did the same as always. It usually results in an ongoing conversation, but at the end of the semester, they have improved a lot. And the result this semester? I had fourteen students (out of 88) that *did not write a single = sign* on the last test. Equality is problematic, so it’s best to avoid it altogether? Yeesh. Overcorrection.

So I think I need to write some explicit standards of mathematical communication. I think there will need to be separate standards for explanations in words, sequences of statements, and possibly graphs/visual stuff (yeah, my own communication might need some work here).

Brainstorming here:

- When writing a sequence of mathematical statements, each statement must have a “verb”, which will usually be an =.
- A line can start with an =, which means it is equal to the line above it.
- Someone with a strong mathematical background who does not attend our class must be able to follow your work
- Use standard mathematical notation

I know there needs to be more. Thoughts?